Our Editorial Standards
At Wellness Nutrition Hub, we are committed to delivering accurate, well-researched, and evidence-informed content. Our editorial standards reflect our dedication to transparency, integrity, and the highest principles of nutritional journalism.
Our Core Publishing Principles
Accuracy & Verification
Every claim in our articles is verified against peer-reviewed scientific literature and reputable sources. We cross-reference multiple authoritative references before publication.
Source Transparency
We disclose all sources and citations openly. Readers can trace the origin of every major claim and review the evidence themselves. No claims without substantiation.
Balanced Perspective
We present evidence fairly, acknowledging different viewpoints and limitations of research. We avoid sensationalism and overstated conclusions not supported by data.
Independence & No Bias
Our editorial team operates independently. We disclose any conflicts of interest and do not allow commercial interests to influence our content or recommendations.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Research & Source Collection
Our writers conduct thorough research using academic databases, peer-reviewed journals, established health organizations, and expert interviews. We prioritize primary sources over secondary interpretations.
Editorial Review
Every article undergoes independent review by our editorial board before publication. Reviewers verify claims, assess source quality, and challenge unsupported statements.
Expert Fact-Check
For articles on complex nutritional topics, we consult with specialized professionals—registered dietitians, nutritionists, and subject matter experts—to validate technical content and ensure accuracy.
Ongoing Monitoring
After publication, we monitor new research and developments. If significant evidence emerges that contradicts an article, we update content promptly and transparently note what changed and why.
Our Editorial Leadership
Jelena Marković
Editor-in-Chief
Ph.D. in Nutritional Sciences with 12 years of editorial experience. Jelena leads our editorial vision and oversees all published content. She specializes in evidence-based nutrition communication and has published extensively on dietary guidelines and public health nutrition.
Marija Nikolić, RDN
Senior Nutrition Editor
Registered Dietitian Nutritionist with expertise in clinical nutrition and dietary assessment. Marija ensures scientific accuracy across all nutrition-focused articles and serves as a primary liaison with our expert review network.
Prof. Aleksandar Kostić
Science & Evidence Advisory Board
Professor of Food Science and Nutrition at Belgrade University. Aleksandar advises on research quality, statistical validity, and ensures our content reflects current scientific consensus. He chairs our fact-checking committee.
Advisory Board Expertise
Our Advisory Board comprises registered dietitians, nutrition researchers, and food scientists from across Serbia and the broader European region. Board members review complex articles, validate methodologies, and provide specialized expertise in their respective areas.
- Nutritional Biochemistry: Expert review of nutrient metabolism and bioavailability claims.
- Clinical Nutrition: Validation of recommendations for specific populations and dietary needs.
- Food Science: Verification of food composition, safety, and processing information.
- Research Methodology: Assessment of study designs and statistical interpretation in published articles.
Author & Contributor Standards
Educational Requirements
All authors and contributors hold advanced degrees in nutrition, food science, public health, or related disciplines. Many maintain professional credentials such as Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) or Certified Nutrition Specialist (CNS) status.
Professional Experience
Writers and editors demonstrate significant professional experience in nutrition science, clinical practice, research, or nutrition education. We prioritize voices with demonstrable expertise and track records in their field.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
All contributors disclose potential conflicts of interest—including affiliations with brands, funding sources, or financial interests. These disclosures appear transparently with each article where relevant.
Writing Guidelines
All contributors follow our detailed style guide, which includes standards for citation format, claim substantiation, and language clarity. We emphasize accessible science writing without sacrificing accuracy or technical rigor.
Corrections & Content Updates Policy
How We Handle Errors
If we identify factual errors, outdated information, or inaccurate citations in published articles, we correct them promptly. We believe corrections strengthen rather than undermine credibility.
Minor Corrections
Spelling, grammar, or small factual updates are corrected silently with a brief update note appended to the article noting the date changed.
Significant Corrections
Substantial factual errors or changes to major claims are corrected with a visible correction notice at the top of the article, explaining what was wrong and what changed.
Research-Based Updates
When new peer-reviewed research substantially changes the evidence on a topic, we update the article and clearly note the date of the update and what new information was added.
Reader Feedback & Reporting Errors
Readers play a vital role in maintaining our editorial integrity. If you notice an inaccuracy, outdated information, or have questions about sources in any article, we welcome your feedback.
Report an Issue
Send detailed feedback to our editorial team with:
- • Article title and URL
- • Specific claim or section in question
- • Your concern or suggested correction
- • Sources supporting your feedback (if applicable)
Our Response Timeline
We aim to acknowledge all editorial inquiries within 48 hours. For substantive corrections, we conduct our own review and update affected content within 5 business days, with transparent correction notices posted for readers.
Correction Log
We maintain a transparent log of all significant corrections and content updates. This demonstrates our commitment to accuracy and accountability. Major corrections are documented with the article title, date published, what was corrected, and why.
Our correction log is available upon request to editors and researchers interested in our editorial quality processes. Contact our editorial team for access.
Our Commitment to You
Wellness Nutrition Hub exists to empower readers with reliable, evidence-based nutritional information. Our editorial standards reflect that mission—every article, every claim, and every source reflects our dedication to accuracy, integrity, and transparency. When you read our content, you can trust that it has been rigorously reviewed and sourced.
Editorial Independence
Wellness Nutrition Hub maintains strict editorial independence. Our content is not influenced by commercial partnerships, advertising, or sponsored relationships. All recommendations and information are based on scientific evidence, not commercial interests.
We are transparent about any affiliate relationships or partnerships. When we reference brands or products, we do so only when substantiated by evidence and with clear disclosure of any relationships. Our primary goal is serving readers' need for accurate, unbiased nutritional information.
Questions about our editorial standards, publishing process, or specific articles? We encourage you to contact our editorial team. We value your trust and remain committed to earning it through consistent integrity and excellence.